Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 12718 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2000 23:27:20 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2000 23:27:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 17038 invoked by uid 40001); 26 Sep 2000 23:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 17035 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2000 23:28:12 -0000 Received: from mr.egroups.com (208.50.144.80) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2000 23:28:12 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-4446-970010888-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by mr.egroups.com with NNFMP; 26 Sep 2000 23:28:10 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 26 Sep 2000 23:28:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 3549 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.53) by mta2 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:28:04 -0700 Received: from 200.42.117.153 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.117.153] To: lojban@egroups.com Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04.0597 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B4A7250:01C02811] From: "Jorge Llambias" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:28:04 GMT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Get Much Ca$h ! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1368 Lines: 47 la aulun cusku di'e >roda nirna roda >roda se nirna roda >roda selnirna roda >roda roda selnirna It is not clear what is the effect of quantifying the same variable twice in the same sentence. Either the second {da} has to be taken as a new variable, saying that each thing is a nerve/neuron of each thing, or the second quantifier has to be ignored, saying that each thing is a nerve/neuron of itself. >lo roda cu selnirna lo roda (???) {lo roda} is the same as {da}. At least one thing. >ro lo zasti cu selnirna ro lo zasti (!?) >ro lo zasti cu selnirna ro lo zasti soi vo'a vo'e The viceversa is already included in the first claim. >ro lo zasti cu selnirna vo'a I think this one means "of itself". co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro APR with NO annual fee! http://click.egroups.com/1/9333/4/_/17627/_/970010888/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com