From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Wed Oct 04 22:34:38 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 5 Oct 2000 05:34:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2978 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 05:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Oct 2000 05:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scrabble.freeuk.net) (212.126.144.6) by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 05:34:37 -0000 Received: from du-008-0040.freeuk.com ([212.126.151.40] helo=rrbcurnow.freeuk.com ident=root) by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13h3fv-00047m-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Thu, 05 Oct 2000 06:34:36 +0100 Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 13h3fc-00003g-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:34:16 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:34:15 +0100 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: More questions on space (time) - was: Get Much Ca$h ! Message-ID: <20001005063415.A207@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Reply-To: Richard Curnow Mail-Followup-To: lojban@egroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp In-Reply-To: ; from jjllambias@hotmail.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:35:44PM +0000 From: Richard Curnow X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4493 On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:35:44PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > > >1) "one more time" (=pa ji'a roi) malglico? > > This may not be grammatical, though. I don't really > understand where UIs are allowed and where they're not, > this may be one of the places where they're not. > It's fine gramatically. You can put UIs after anything. They are 'absorbed' into the preceding token before the main parse begins, so gramatically this is considered equivalent to 'paroi'. This is step 4e) of the description quoted below from the grammar.300 file : e. Absorb all members of selma'o DAhO, FUhO, FUhE, UI, Y, and CAI into the previous token. All of these null grammar tokens are permitted following any word of the grammar, without interfering with that word's grammatical function, or causing any effect on the grammatical interpretation of any other token in the text. Indicators at the beginning of text are explicitly handled by the grammar. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/