From pycyn@aol.com Wed Oct 18 10:53:05 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 18 Oct 2000 17:53:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 6061 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 17:53:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Oct 2000 17:53:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mail.aol.com) (152.163.225.9) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2000 17:52:59 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.31.) id a.13.c36b58c (4232) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:52:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <13.c36b58c.271f3d71@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:52:49 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] looking at arjlujv.txt
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4582

It looks like rampant literalism is loose again (much as I hate to accuse 
maikl of this).  Remember, the best tanru/lujvo... is vivid and shocking and 
catchy, in particular NOT a definition.  These puppies used to be called 
metaphors for a good reason.  Be crafty, not correct.