From cowan@ccil.org Fri Oct 27 03:39:25 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@locke.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 27 Oct 2000 10:39:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 17208 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 10:39:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Oct 2000 10:39:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO locke.ccil.org) (192.190.237.102) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2000 10:39:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (cowan@localhost) by locke.ccil.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA04930; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:49:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:49:59 -0400 (EDT) To: Cyril Slobin Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Another morphology question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4715 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Cyril Slobin wrote: > coi rodo > > Is sequence of vovels that does not form valid diphtong possible? > In particular, is cmene {rafael} valid or it should be {rafa,el}? The comma is always optional: "rafael" and "rafa,el" are the same name, not two different names. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter