From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Nov 02 13:13:07 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 7184 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hm.egroups.com) (10.1.10.45) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.122] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 Nov 2000 21:13:04 -0000
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 21:13:03 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: abstraction focus
Message-ID: <8tslcv+qe99@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001102135743.00ae9100@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 857
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4791

--- In lojban@egroups.com, "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@l...> wrote:
> At 07:04 AM 11/02/2000 +0000, Alfred W. Tueting (T=FCting) wrote:
> >Only recently discovered that the cmavo {ce'u} (abstraction focus) is
> >not included in any of the lists I downloaded.

> I'm not sure why not, since I just checked and it is in my lists as well =
=3D=0D
as=20
> in my local master copy of the lojban.org site, in all the cmavo and=20
> logdata3 files under ythe wordlist directory.  The keyword is "lambda".
>=20
> va'e, as mentioned by R Curnow a few weeks back, is not in the lists, and=
=3D=0D
=20
> we are trying to find out why.  But I don't know of any others missing.

Sorry, for unknown reason I downloaded a 1994 -version of the cmavo list wi=
=3D=0D
th still a couple of more cmavo missing :( (this was=20
not too long ago!).

.aulun.