From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sun Nov 26 10:45:46 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 26 Nov 2000 18:45:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 98990 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2000 18:45:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2000 18:45:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ho.egroups.com) (10.1.2.219) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2000 19:46:51 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.2.211] by ho.egroups.com with NNFMP; 26 Nov 2000 18:45:45 -0000
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:45:35 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: Problematic entries in the lujvo list
Message-ID: <8vrlof+gvm3@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A1FBE61.23CE8988@math.bas.bg>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 742
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4864

--- In lojban@egroups.com, Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@M...> wrote:
> Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:
> > While reviewing the lujvo list, I have come across several entries
> > which seem erroneous or problematic [...].
> > 
> > For instance, "baljamna" is glossed as "great war", but [...]
> > So the keyword should be changed.
> 
> `war greatly', perhaps?

jamna jam (*to* war)
x1 (person/mass) wars against x2 over territory/matter x3; 
x1 is at war with x2

banli bal ba'i (great, 'grand')
x1 is great/grand in property x2 (ka) by standard x3

x1 cu banli le ka jamna -> balkamjamna -> baljamna -> "grand in warring" ("gloriously warring")
(mi na nelci le du'u go'i)
lei baljamna: "the heroes (I have in mind!)"

co'o mi'e .aulun.