From slobin@ice.ru Thu Nov 16 04:36:48 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24057 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO feast.ice.ru) (213.128.193.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2000 13:37:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by feast.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id PAA01697; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:35:56 +0300 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:35:56 +0300 (MSK) To: michael helsem Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4823 On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, michael helsem wrote: > as far as i can tell, there are only two unassigned: BI'A & CA'U. {ca'u} is for "in front of" (location tense). > others not on the cmavo list: BI'E (p.437 in the Red Book); CE'E (208); CE'U > (161); RE'U (228); VA'E (447). Probably you are using an old cmavo list. There are (at least) two of them walking around - 1994 and 1998 versions. Date is mentioned at the very first line of both lists. -- Cyril Slobin