From phma@oltronics.net Tue Dec 12 14:10:24 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 12 Dec 2000 22:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20564 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 22:10:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2000 22:10:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 22:10:23 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA25155 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:10:17 -0500 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.36, neofelis, , 207.15.133.36 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:10:21(EST) on December 12, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:58:30 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <00121211423801.09168@neofelis> <20001212165002.B2817@twcny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20001212165002.B2817@twcny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00121217101305.09168@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5029 On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Rob Speer wrote: >On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:32:00AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> CVC/CVCV: yes > >Is that really possible? That breaks apart into a gismu form (CVC/CV) and a >cmavo form (CV). Is that allowable provided that the CVC/CV part isn't a gismu? It makes no difference whether it actually is a gismu, but it can't break because of the accent. {kaPSIku} cannot be confused with {KApsi ku}, and it can't break into {ka psiku} because {ps} isn't an initial pair. So {leCPInakaPSIku} can only be interpreted as {le cpina kapsiku}. phma