From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Sun Dec 17 22:47:07 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 18 Dec 2000 06:47:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 24768 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2000 06:47:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Dec 2000 06:47:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net) (195.40.1.45) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2000 06:47:05 -0000 Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (tnt-14-130.easynet.co.uk [212.134.24.130]) by amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BE517791 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 06:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 147u1k-00004A-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 06:44:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 06:44:04 +0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Cultural fu'ivla Message-ID: <20001218064404.B108@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Reply-To: Richard Curnow Mail-Followup-To: lojban@egroups.com References: <0012162022460J.01286@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp In-Reply-To: <0012162022460J.01286@neofelis>; from phma@oltronics.net on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:04:01PM -0500 From: Richard Curnow X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5074 On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:04:01PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Invent Yourself wrote: > >Is there a list of cultural/national/language fu'ivla? Should we work on > >creating one? > > Here are some suggestions: > > magjaro ({madjaro} won't work as the {ma} falls off) > bolgaro > labyrusko (a lujvo, and there will be a few others) > nanslovo In the Reference Grammar, section 4.16 talks of using fu'ivla of the form CCVVCV for those cultural purposes not covered by the gismu. The corresponding form CCVVCy can then be used as a rafsi to form lujvo. Is this stuff still considered baselined? In which case Pierre's list will need transforming into this format. If it's not considered to be current Lojban any more I'd like to know, as I was going to be building support for this into the next release of jbofi'e (in terms of the algorithm to split lujvo into rafsi at least). Clearly this might save me some work :-) co'o mi'e ritcyd. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/