From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sat Dec 16 04:14:21 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 88182 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fj.egroups.com) (10.1.10.46) by mta2 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.94] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:14:18 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: detri Message-ID: <91fmaq+qh4q@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 709 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5063 --- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" wrote: > > la xod cusku di'e > > >but look at definition two: > > > > facki [ fak fa'i ] discover ; 'find' > > x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3; x1 > > finds (fi) x3 (object) > > The second definition is an attempt to salvage {facki} for > the basic meaning of "find", but the x2 place is still there. > > >ja'o mi facki fi le sfani befi'o nenri le mi stasu > > It should be {*be* fi'o *se* nenri}, or just {*be* ne'i}, or {poi nenri}. .i mutce pajmanci .i stidi lu mi facki fi pa/lo sfani fi'o nenri le mi stasu li'u .a lu mi facki fi pa/lo sfani ne'i le mi stasu li'u .aulun.