From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Feb 02 10:20:51 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@erika.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 2 Feb 2001 18:20:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 52959 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 18:11:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2001 18:11:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 19:12:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12IBPG17934 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:11:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:11:25 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] fasnu? In-Reply-To: <20010202130054.M19196@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5275 On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:16:36PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > > What is the point of fasnu? Given that we have le nu, I can't imagine > > > what I'd use it for, except maybe emphasis. > > > > > > > > nu:fasnu::si'o:sidbo > > Except that sidbo has 3 arguments, fasnu has only one. Given the > existence of nu, what the heck's the point? And yes, I understand that > 'nu' comes from 'fasnu', but that doesn't really change fasnu's > pointlessness. mi na jimpe le ka vajni fa le ni tergismu .i ko fanva lu mi viska le fasnu li'u le su'u pilno zo nu ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!