From jcowan@reutershealth.com Fri Feb 02 13:38:49 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 2 Feb 2001 21:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 88946 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 21:29:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2001 21:29:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 21:29:56 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07563; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:31:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A7B26F5.6010709@reutershealth.com> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:30:29 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010119 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivia Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5282 Olivia wrote: > a good way to alleviate this problem would be for the moderator to > change the reply-to attribute of the list's posting settings to > "All (replies go to all members of this group)"..... For why we don't do that, please read "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- There is / one art || John Cowan no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein