From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Fri Feb 09 10:35:29 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 9 Feb 2001 18:35:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 92948 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2001 18:35:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Feb 2001 18:35:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta3 with SMTP; 9 Feb 2001 19:36:31 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA05235; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:41:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:41:20 -0500 To: pycyn@aol.com Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] afterthought emphasis? Message-ID: <20010209134119.B4972@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: pycyn@aol.com, lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from pycyn@aol.com on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:10:00PM -0500 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5360 On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:10:00PM -0500, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 2/8/2001 4:15:27 PM Central Standard Time, > rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca writes: > > > > > Any particular reason there seems to be no word for afterthough > > emphasis? > > > > > > We didn't think of it until afterwards. -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP