From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Mon Feb 05 10:30:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 5 Feb 2001 18:30:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 64334 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 18:30:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Feb 2001 18:30:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 18:30:07 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA19008; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:35:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:35:52 -0500 To: And Rosta Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom? Message-ID: <20010205133552.A18781@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: And Rosta , lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <20010202173355.F15472@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from arosta@uclan.ac.uk on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:09:04PM -0000 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5316 On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:09:04PM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > > From: Robin Lee Powell [mailto:rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca] > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:56:25PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > > > > > > The way you have this list set up, pine offers two options: to reply to > > > the sender only, or to reply to everybody. "Everybody" means BOTH the > > > original poster, and the list. > > > > > > > > Then use a less sucky mailer. http://www.mutt.org/ has a L key > > specifically for mailing list replies. Which I sometimes forget to use. > > Outlook has the same defect that Invent Yourself reports for pine. > What would a less sucky mailer than Outlook be? It must run under > Windows 98 The second clause contradicts the first, but you might want to try Netscape's mailer. -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP