From robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR Wed Feb 21 14:43:50 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 21 Feb 2001 22:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 25455 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 22:31:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Feb 2001 22:31:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr) (139.179.10.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 22:31:50 -0000 Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (IDENT:robin@slip2.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.70.12]) by firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1LMaj005855 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:36:45 +0200 (EET) Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR Message-ID: <3A9443AD.BF14ED52@bilkent.edu.tr> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:39:41 +0200 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:su'u References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010221151359.00b9f3d0@127.0.0.1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: robin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5558 "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" wrote: > > At 05:08 PM 02/21/2001 +0000, And Rosta wrote: > >Nor can it be laziness, because intellectually, rather than digitally, > >zei lujvo are the easier option. > > But digital laziness exceeds intellectual laziness among the programmer > types that frequent Lojbanistan. Which is why a lot of cmavo remind me of UNIX commands! Rather off-topic, here's an acronymical conundrum I set my students: Why do UN and IRA take a definite article, while UNESCO and ETA do not? Some of the students got it: none of my colleagues did. co'o mi'e robin.