From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Sat Feb 24 17:50:56 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 25 Feb 2001 01:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 78300 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 01:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2001 01:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta2 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 01:50:55 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id UAA19564; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 20:57:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 20:57:10 -0500 To: Jorge Llambias Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Emotional expression. Message-ID: <20010224205710.P2351@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Jorge Llambias , lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jjllambias@hotmail.com on Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 11:53:22PM +0000 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5611 On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 11:53:22PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > Robin Lee Powell: > > > > >{ju'o zei o'o zei cinmo} > > >{ju'o zei o'o cinmo} > > > >Presumably, but neither work. The ju'o binds to the word immediatly > >before it; I don't think that's fixable. > > That is true when used as an attitudinal. When it's part > of a lujvo it can't bind to the preceding word, so they do > work. I'm not sure what the place structures would be though. > I suppose the first one inherits the structure from cinmo > with the x2 place filled by the attitudinals: > > ju'o zei o'o zei cinmo: x1 feels certainty/patience about x2. Umm, according to jbofi'e: le ka mi ju'o zei o'o zei cinmo Warning: Sentence may be missing selbri at line 1 column 1? (0[{le cinmo} VAU])1 KEI> KU} VAU])0 IOW, the ju'o binds to the mi. Apparently zei is happy to bind to only one argument, unless this is a bug in jbofi'e (which it looks like it might be). -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP