From pycyn@aol.com Mon Feb 26 08:34:43 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 26 Feb 2001 16:34:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 99969 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2001 16:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2001 16:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r15.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.69) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2001 16:34:41 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id r.bd.c0e4f58 (7319) for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:34:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:34:19 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] rut pamo'o To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_bd.c0e4f58.27cbdf8b_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10501 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5620 --part1_bd.c0e4f58.27cbdf8b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/25/2001 10:41:39 PM Central Standard Time, phma@oltronics.net writes: > lei re bersa se cmene zo maxLON .e zo kiLION > "The mass of two sons is named Machlon and the mass is named Kilyon." I suppose that this works, but isn't there a way to do this unambiguously without going to "the one son..., the other son..."? This would be true if one of the boys were called by both names and the other was just plain Bill. And, of course, there is the issue of what the mass itself is called -- probably "the sons of Elimelech" or so. --part1_bd.c0e4f58.27cbdf8b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/25/2001 10:41:39 PM Central Standard Time,
phma@oltronics.net writes:


lei re bersa se cmene zo maxLON .e zo kiLION

"The mass of two sons is named Machlon and the mass is named Kilyon."  I
suppose that this works, but  isn't there a way to do this unambiguously
without going to "the one son..., the other son..."?  This would be true if
one of the boys were called by both names and the other was just plain Bill.  
And, of course, there is the issue of what the mass itself is called --
probably "the sons of Elimelech" or so.  
--part1_bd.c0e4f58.27cbdf8b_boundary--