From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Fri Feb 02 14:31:16 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 2 Feb 2001 22:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 96903 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 22:28:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2001 22:28:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta2 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 22:28:11 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id RAA21804 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:33:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:33:55 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom? Message-ID: <20010202173355.F15472@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <3A7B26F5.6010709@reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from xod@sixgirls.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:56:25PM -0500 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5288 On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:56:25PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, John Cowan wrote: > > > Olivia wrote: > > > > > a good way to alleviate this problem would be for the moderator to > > > change the reply-to attribute of the list's posting settings to > > > "All (replies go to all members of this group)"..... > > > > For why we don't do that, please read "Reply-To Munging > > Considered Harmful" at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > The way you have this list set up, pine offers two options: to reply to > the sender only, or to reply to everybody. "Everybody" means BOTH the > original poster, and the list. Then use a less sucky mailer. http://www.mutt.org/ has a L key specifically for mailing list replies. Which I sometimes forget to use. 8) -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP