From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Mar 20 17:54:12 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 90475 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.226) by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 02:55:16 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:54:11 -0800 Received: from 200.41.210.21 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.21] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [: Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc] Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11.0448 (UTC) FILETIME=[D307FF80:01C0B1A9] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6082 la ritcrd cusku di'e > > > > pu ki mi pu'o je banai snada tu'a le trene > >I think there's a ku >missing here - maybe "pu ki ku mi" or "pu ku mi" was intended? You're right, I completely missed it! If it had been {pu mi} I would have detected it immediately, but I guess I associated {pu ki} with {pu ku} and didn't realize there was anything strange. Just goes to show how far we are from fluency yet... co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.