From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Tue Mar 27 10:30:45 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 27 Mar 2001 18:30:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 73043 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 18:30:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2001 18:30:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hm.egroups.com) (10.1.10.45) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2001 18:30:43 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.4.69] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 Mar 2001 18:30:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:30:38 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: lojban audial recognition etc.
Message-ID: <99qm8e+6r94@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 976
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6235

Recently, I uploaded an audio sample (.rm) to Yahoo Groups "lojban" and won=
=3D=0D
der whether its comprehensible or not. It's the initial=20
part of a poem I translated from an ancient Chinese style poetry of strict =
=3D=0D
"l=FC shih" type. (You can find the Lojban text at
http://www.fa-kuan.muc.de/LOJBAN.RXML ).

.aulun.

BTW, IMHO one reason for new Lojban-interested people getting bored off and=
=3D=0D
 leaving again might be long philosophical threads of=20
the DJUNO/KRICI kind - whereas basic vocabulary to express ourselves is sti=
=3D=0D
ll missing or at least not at all obvious! (like:=20
"already"/"still", "not yet"/"no longer" etc. - Don't remember the old thre=
=3D=0D
ad about this topic, which - as far I recall - had no real=20
conclusion: naza'o/za'onai ???) Shouldn't we better leave the ivory tower a=
=3D=0D
nd turn toward people instead of discussing "linguistic"=20
specialties as sort of an oblivious and eccentric navel gazing?