From graywyvern@hotmail.com Thu Mar 08 12:27:29 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 8 Mar 2001 20:27:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 31146 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2001 20:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Mar 2001 20:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.209) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2001 21:28:31 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:27:27 -0800 Received: from 209.176.48.44 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2001 20:27:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.44] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [humanmarkup] Introducing the Logical Language Group Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 20:27:26 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2001 20:27:27.0219 (UTC) FILETIME=[310B0C30:01C0A80E] From: "michael helsem" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 5739 >From: John Cowan li'o >Naturally I am not >proposing that HumanML be done directly in Lojban! > why not--first of all, how do we say "human markup" in lojban? i confess i'm not familiar with the jargon that's taken from... then, what's "XML"? li'o > > Each paradigm in psychology and spirituality has a different way of > > describing human characteristics-- so why reify any particular notation, even lojban's, when there's no useful consensus? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com