From graywyvern@hotmail.com Mon Apr 30 14:51:28 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 30 Apr 2001 21:51:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 58430 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.196) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:51:26 -0700 Received: from 209.176.48.26 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.26] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lujvo place structures Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4BFA0B0:01C0D1BF] From: "michael helsem" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7000 >From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group li'o >Such a program would take the tanru >for any lujvo and generate the place structure that lujvo would have if no >places were combined or deleted, using the standard codes and conventions >for labelling the places. except that wouldn't someone still have to decide from the semantic content, whether the JE-lujvo or the BE-lujvo conventions should be followed? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com