From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Tue Apr 17 01:42:59 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 17 Apr 2001 08:42:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 41379 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2001 08:42:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Apr 2001 08:42:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mu.egroups.com) (10.1.1.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2001 08:42:58 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.2.59] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Apr 2001 08:42:56 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:42:53 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: http://nuzban.wiw.org -- Dude, this site _rocks_.
Message-ID: <9bgvmd+u702@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F127gnoWtA4oup2gjKo00003fd6@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1465
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6608

--- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
>=20
> la aulun cusku di'e
>=20
> >xu me lu terfendysfu je moklu terbilma li'u (TMT)? to  ku'i clani toi .i=
=3D=0D
 mi=20
> >nelmau zo fendi noi matmau ge'u  zo sepli
>=20
> i xu do zmadu zo fendi le ka nelci
> i ma fendi le sufti reda i kusru
> i mi zmanei zo sepli zo fendi

Because I like the x3-place of {fendi} with the idea of (divided in) "parts=
=3D=0D
" or "segments" (-> partitioned/segmented hoof) rather=20
than that of {sepli} which only denotes that "stuff" *between* those "parts=
=3D=0D
" (i.e. in our hoof example: noda!)
Further, as beautifully shown in your example "i ma fendi le sufti reda", {=
=3D=0D
fendi} gives the idea of something devided, i.e. (partly)=20
separated from *itself*, whereas {sepli} means separated/apart from an x2 w=
=3D=0D
hich assumably has to be something else than x1.
Look at the two definitions: "apart" and "separate" (of sepli) is something=
=3D=0D
 else than "devide(d)" (of fendi)

> i ma fendi le sufti reda i kusru

I'm  not too happy with the "agent" either, yet this seems to be just "psyc=
=3D=0D
holinguistic" ;-) Yet, x1 of {fendi} might be "mother=20
nature" as well, hence not at all "cruel".
BTW, there's no good word for "nature" in Lojban! Perhaps we should search =
=3D=0D
for this in lat. "natura" (about: born/created/
produced by itself?) or chin. "=B6=80=B5M" zi4 ran2/zyh ran (being by itsel=
f)

co'o mi'e .aulun.