From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Apr 19 17:19:35 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 20 Apr 2001 00:19:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 77233 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.184) by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:19:34 -0700
Received: from 200.41.210.24 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.24]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [lojban] RE:not only
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F18495EFk2H3b98Ktdh0000779c@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2001 00:19:34.0682 (UTC) FILETIME=[93CEBFA0:01C0C92F]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6710


la and cusku di'e

>So here's my suggestion:
>
>   lo'i nelci be le va stizu cu me le'i mlatu
>
>or
>
>   lo'i nelci be le va stizu du le'i mlatu

(It should be {cu du}.)

I agree that that is the meaning, but pc would have
"is a subset of" instead of {du}:

   lo'i nelci be le va stizu cu klesi le'i mlatu

co'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.