From phma@oltronics.net Thu Apr 26 12:37:50 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 26 Apr 2001 19:37:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12472 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2001 19:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Apr 2001 19:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.44) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2001 19:37:48 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id EB1F93C567; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:29:45 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] djataurte Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:26:43 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <01042523234609.02780@neofelis> <4.3.2.7.2.20010426021004.00c31d90@127.0.0.1> <20010426095910.U8953@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20010426095910.U8953@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0104261429450C.01394@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6945 On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >As someone who knows very little about fu'ivla formation: > >Is djataurte legal as it stands or not? If not, what do we do with it? >It's supposed to refer to the food, btw. It is a valid fu'ivla but will be taken as type 4 because it doesn't follow the type 3 rule. By the rule it would be "cidjrtarte". phma