From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Apr 19 01:07:23 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 19 Apr 2001 08:07:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 32213 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 08:07:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Apr 2001 08:07:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ho.egroups.com) (10.1.2.219) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 08:07:21 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.112] by ho.egroups.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2001 08:07:19 -0000
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 08:07:17 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE:not only
Message-ID: <9bm6bl+3ano@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F216qTnrrXj7gC2DWpm00005b68@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1216
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 6685

--- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:

> It's extremely hard for me to believe that "only my wife likes
> olives" does not entail "my wife likes olives", but it doesn't
> really matter if this is how English works. In Lojban, if you
> say {le mi speni ku po'o nelci lo'e rasygrute} then you are
> commited to {le mi speni cu nelci lo'e rasygrute}, no matter
> whether the English "equivalent" requires it or not. Also,
> {po'o} is appropriate only if there is no other relevant olive
> liker. Just like in {le mi speni ku ji'a nelci lo'e rasygrute},
> {ji'a} would be appropriate only if there is some other relevant
> olive liker.

If this were true (that "only my wife likes olives" does not entail "my wife likes olives"), I'd be deeply shocked and  would have to 
state that English *not only* "occasionally" is not a logical language! (Hence, no longer wondering/puzzled about statements of the 
kind la buc. is uttering...)
I'm not a trained logician (at least not of that kind), but {le mi speni ku po'o nelci lo'e rasygrute} (and it also should in English 
logic!) states:
1) lemi speni cu nelci lo'e rasygrute
2) .ijeji'a ra nelci be ri be'o pamei
 
co'o mi'e .aulun.