From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue May 22 17:40:31 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 May 2001 00:40:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 73074 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 00:39:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 May 2001 00:39:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta2 with SMTP; 23 May 2001 00:39:33 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A6E64126028E; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:40:06 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Cmavo
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 20:39:35 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEGBCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7214

Coi rodo,

	The reference grammar says all cmavo beginning with X are reserved for
experimental use, but xu and xa clearly aren't. What happened? Are any other
X cmavo taken already, or just xu and xa?

                             --kreig. daniyl.

     'Through all of the islands and all of the highlands, if we couldn't
laugh we would all go insane.'
                     -djimis. bufyt.

pgp public key ID:  0x5C3A1E74