From pycyn@aol.com Sat Jun 16 15:15:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 16 Jun 2001 22:15:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 52897 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2001 22:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Jun 2001 22:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m08.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.163) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2001 22:15:24 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id r.11e.63dbce (1759) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:15:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11e.63dbce.285d346e@aol.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:15:10 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_11e.63dbce.285d346e_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 8073 --part1_11e.63dbce.285d346e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/15/2001 10:10:55 PM Central Daylight Time, rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes: > It _Deeply_ Scares Me that someone who doesn't know those things would > consider himself capable of telling others what is and is not > Well, this is the only list I am on and the vast majority of what I do that is any way connected with the internet, so, since no one has used these terms before here (should I feel honored?), I did not know them. Did I say something about what is or is not appropriate in terms of distribution of information. I can remember some conditional statements like "If you want to grow Lojban, you would be well-advised to put messages out in forms that can be read by MS Windows users, since that is where the greatest growth potential is." I am not sure whether that is about appropriateness, but it is certainly good practical advice. I am unclear about what that has to do knowing cultic code. --part1_11e.63dbce.285d346e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/15/2001 10:10:55 PM Central Daylight Time,
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:


It _Deeply_ Scares Me that someone who doesn't know those things would
consider himself capable of telling others what is and is not
appropriate in terms of distribution of information on the internet


Well, this is the only list I am on and the vast majority of what I do that
is any way connected with the internet, so, since no one has used these terms
before here (should I feel honored?), I did not know them.  
Did I say something about what is or is not appropriate in terms of
distribution of information.  I can remember some conditional statements like
"If you want to grow Lojban, you would be well-advised to put messages out in
forms that can be read by MS Windows users, since that is where the greatest
growth potential is."  I am not sure whether that is about appropriateness,
but it is certainly good practical advice.  I am unclear about what that has
to do knowing cultic code. --part1_11e.63dbce.285d346e_boundary--