From ragnarok@pobox.com Wed Jun 13 20:48:30 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 70743 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta1 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 03:48:29 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A4235EF400B2; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:48:51 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:48:32 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFKEPJCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106132342130.28772-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7974

>A difference is only a difference if it makes a difference. I see there is
>a difference in the character string. Is there a difference in meaning?

Not in English - you're being linguistically biased again. In one, the
important part is the feeling. In the other, it is the going. Either one
expresses both, however.

Oh wait, I was calmly shutting up about attitudinals. I hope this isn't to
controversial, if it turns out it is ignore me!

                             --la kreig.daniyl

     'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci
     .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi'
                     -la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji:  0x5C3A1E74