From richardt@flash.net Wed Jun 13 17:01:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: richardt@flash.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 14 Jun 2001 00:01:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10156 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 23:58:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 23:58:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pimout1-int.prodigy.net) (207.115.63.77) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 23:58:19 -0000 Received: from flash.net ([216.51.101.196]) by pimout1-int.prodigy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5DNwIU151742 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:58:18 -0400 Sender: richardt@pimout1-int.prodigy.net Message-ID: <3B27ED71.6A88F968@flash.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:47:13 -0500 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Attitudinals References: <20010613160809.J14438@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Richard Todd X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7955 Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Oh jesus fuck. Witness the english attitudinal! Note that it is not an assertion. If only it were tied to a sentence we could determine if the sentence were an assertion or not. :) He complains about 2-char tabs (which don't exist), but if he could only see the extra ^M at the end of every line he types.... or the way his HTML mail looks in pine... Richard