From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Jun 06 19:00:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 7 Jun 2001 02:00:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 62300 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2001 02:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Jun 2001 02:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta3 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2001 02:00:23 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (244.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.244]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5720J465481 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:00:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010606220454.00d7d980@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:06:18 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] More lexing curiosities - la'i within cmene? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7619 At 01:20 AM 06/07/2001 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la djan cusku di'e > > >That isn't what the rule is: it's a rule for some other parallel universe. > >I don't follow rules just because they are there. I follow them >when it makes sense to follow them (or when the punishment for >breaking them makes it not worth it, but in this case there is >no serious punishment). That may be true, but I hope Curnow wants his computer programs to follow the rules. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org