From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Jun 12 17:16:17 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 00:16:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 15604 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 23:41:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Jun 2001 23:41:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A8CA699400B0; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:42:02 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:41:26 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIEODCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <m159xOY-000IebC@localhost>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7876

 > Because an indented volume with a cap is not the same as an indented
 > volume without a cap.  The one, the `cave with a door', is a `botpi';
 > the other, the `natural cave', is a `kevna'.

Then isn't the bottle by the side of the road a kevna, making this whole
discussion of it and whether botpi fo noda is a botpi irrelevant since we
can just call it a kevna?

                             --la kreig.daniyl

     'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci
     .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi'
                     -la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji:  0x5C3A1E74