From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Jun 10 10:30:51 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 10 Jun 2001 17:30:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 77827 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2001 17:30:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Jun 2001 17:30:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2001 17:30:50 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AEC7F4300076; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:30:47 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>, <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:30:47 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCEMBCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F17dGJ5OGQOuE3chAHr00002639@hotmail.com>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7732

Uh... since when is <xu> an attitudinal?
It's not even in the same chapter of the reference grammar. It serves a
completely different purpose from attitudinals. Asking whether something is
true does not imply any opinion on the subject. Saying you hope it is
implies that you would be pleased to learn it was true.

                             --la kreig.daniyl

     'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci
     .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi'
                     -la djimis.BYFet

pgp public key ID:  0x5C3A1E74
Now how to translate my pgp key...