From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jun 08 15:27:54 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 8 Jun 2001 22:27:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 23282 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta2 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic223.cl8.cais.net [205.177.20.223]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f58MRn445865 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:27:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608182945.00d804d0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 18:33:48 -0400 To: Subject: Re: [lojban] dai was: rabbity sand-laugher In-Reply-To: <01060816142502.05188@neofelis> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1> <69.166a5a35.28516924@aol.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7669 At 04:12 PM 06/08/2001 -0400, cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri wrote: >I used "a'adai" for "Note:", that is, to mark something that the reader should >pay attention to. Is that an appropriate use of "dai"? I think that ju'i[do'u] is more appropriate for "pay attention". I'm not sure that is what I always mean by "Note:" though. (The do'u usually will NOT be able to be elided). lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org