From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Fri Jun 08 13:39:19 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 8 Jun 2001 20:39:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 65777 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 20:39:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jun 2001 20:39:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.40) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 20:39:14 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id 536383C646; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:14:30 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: dai was: rabbity sand-laugher Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:12:21 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <69.166a5a35.28516924@aol.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060816142502.05188@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 7663 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 de'i Fri, 08 Jun 2001 la Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) cusku di'e > If I understand you (always a big "if" since I don't do enough Lojban > reading), this is precisely what pycyn was complaining about that I thought > was NOT applicable to the discussion. Lojban attitudinals, as expressions, > NEVER "mean" a bridi, which is a claim. "pe'idai" is NOT a claim that the > other person opines something (which is what "do jinvi" means; rather it > says that the speaker intuits/empathizes that the other person seems to be > expressing the emotion marked with dai. Having used dai on an evidential, > we have to treat that evidential as an emotional expression (the > evidentials can be used attitudinally, so this makes sense) that the > speaker is picking up. I used "a'adai" for "Note:", that is, to mark something that the reader should pay attention to. Is that an appropriate use of "dai"? cmeclax -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7ITIlBETrxUjAxlERApMrAJ93F2dgJOzyUh1v4pC0xFgx7SO8HwCfQ6h+ m4dOwCwkEPqEEhJAhE3rtEk= =Dr2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----