From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Tue Jul 17 06:33:43 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 17 Jul 2001 13:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 61602 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 13:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Jul 2001 13:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta2 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 13:32:48 -0000 Received: from m812-mp1-cvx1b.bir.ntl.com ([62.255.43.44] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15MUix-0002T0-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:17:15 +0100 To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" Subject: vau zo'e Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:31:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 8668 [resend: seems to have bounced on first send] I read on the bottom of p345 that (in effect) 1. ga broda gi brode vau zo'e is equivalent to 2. ga broda zo'e gi brode zo'e rather than to 3. ga broda zo'e goi ko'a gi brode ko'a -- this being a peculiarity of zo'e. I wonder firstly whether this was really intended, and secondly how to render (3) more succinctly. As (4)? 4. ga broda gi brode vau ko'a no'u zo'e --And.