From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Aug 21 12:14:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 21 Aug 2001 19:14:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 96971 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09029; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:15:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B82B2A5.6060800@reutershealth.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:12:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: And Rosta Cc: lojban Subject: Re: du'u in lieu of ka (was: Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9873 And Rosta wrote: > Ruloid 1. > Zo'e fills any empty place. > [I *think* this is somewhere in Woldy.] > > Ruloid 2. > Zo'e cannot be construed as ce'u. > [Thus spake The Cowan, recently.] > > Ruloid 3. > Ce'u can be elided. I meant that an explicit zo'e should probably not be construed as ce'u, not that it cannot. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel