From pycyn@aol.com Mon Aug 20 08:58:31 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 20 Aug 2001 15:58:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 14179 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2001 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r02.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.98) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.140.314721 (4322) for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:57:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <140.314721.28b28d5b@aol.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:57:15 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_140.314721.28b28d5b_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9812 --part1_140.314721.28b28d5b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All of the options mentioned assume that {ka} and {du'u} remain separate. Should they be combined, then only option 1 (all {ce'u} in place) remains, since the general rule for dropping {zo'e} takes precidence. It would be possible to work out some way to drop some {ce'u} perhaps, but hardly seems worthwhile. I oppose the collapse of {ka} and {du'u}, not only for this reason but also to maintain the useful practical distinctions between them, however theorretically unifed they are. --part1_140.314721.28b28d5b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All of the options mentioned assume that {ka} and {du'u} remain separate.  
Should they be combined, then only option 1 (all {ce'u} in place) remains,
since the general rule for dropping {zo'e} takes precidence.  It would be
possible to work out some way to drop some {ce'u} perhaps, but hardly seems
worthwhile.  
I oppose the collapse of {ka} and {du'u}, not only for this reason but also
to maintain the useful practical distinctions between them, however
theorretically unifed they are. --part1_140.314721.28b28d5b_boundary--