From mark@kli.org Wed Aug 29 15:37:45 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: mark@kli.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 22:37:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 66172 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 22:36:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 22:36:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n1.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.10.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 22:36:02 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: mark@kli.org Received: from [10.1.4.22] by hh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2001 22:36:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:35:58 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: google in lojban Message-ID: <9mjqoe+97u1@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20010829171254.E11297@barsoom.net> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1147 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 162.33.229.2 From: mark@kli.org X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10272 (grumble. One day I'll learn how not to let Yahoo eat my work) --- In lojban@y..., the Edward Blevins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:34:43PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > I signed up and am awaiting their decision on supporting Lojban. >=20 > They appear to have someone already working on Klingon, so I am > hopeful. Let us know what you find out. I seem to remember something about a Klingon tranlsation. I should know, but I don't remember who's supposed to be working on it. I hope it isn't me, since I don't appear to have done anything for it. A more-or-less former advisor of mine is at Google, but I don't know if he's involved in such decisions, so writing to him might or might not help. Probably can't hurt. Wow, they even have a Volap?=FCk version allegedly in the works! I don't think Lojban will have any trouble getting accepted with such things being worked on. Consider too that they have nothing to LOSE by getting it done in a particular language. Why would they turn down an offer for pretty much any language? (There are probably exceptions out there... but not many) ~mark