From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Mon Aug 27 06:35:06 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 13:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 93294 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 13:31:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 13:31:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 13:31:57 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f7RDVk306868 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:31:46 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:31:46 -0600 (MDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Induction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10154 On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Invent Yourself wrote: > > induction is sucta. deduction and abduction are both tolsucta. deductio= n is > > the logical reverse of abduction. > > Thank you! But shouldn't we distinguish abduction from deduction? And > where does nibli fit in? Seems like you could distinguish between abduction and deduction by specifying (with bi'u) which place was the conclusion. - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose