From araizen@newmail.net Fri Aug 31 08:08:19 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 15:08:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 53541 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 15:05:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:17 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.180.216]) by out.newmail.net ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:06:17 +0200
Message-ID: <032e01c13236$e300fc80$8ab5003e@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: properties vs. relationships
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:36:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10331

Why is it that there is a property in the x3 of

    do cnino mi le ka ce'u xunre

Couldn't it just as easily be

    do cnino mi le ka le nu ce'u xunre cu se sanji ce'u

Likewise with "ko'a pamoi lei nanmu le ka ce'u clani". Shouldn't it be

    ko'a pamoi lei nanmu le ka ce'u clamau ce'u

Otherwise, how would you get ascending order vs. descending order?
Maybe the short forms should be considered abbreviations of the ones
with an explicit relationship.

mu'o mi'e .adam.