From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Aug 22 12:03:47 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 22 Aug 2001 19:03:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 26530 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 18:57:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2001 18:57:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 18:57:31 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:35:52 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:02:46 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:02:21 +0100 To: cowan Cc: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] ce'u Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9923 >>> John Cowan 08/19/01 04:03am >>> #As to multi-ce'u abstractions, one question that has never been answered #(perhaps not even raised) is what sort of thing a "ckaji be ka #ce'u broda ce'u" is. It seems plausible to me that it is a Lojban sequenc= e. #Any thoughts? My thought is that a multi ce'u ka/du'u is not a se ckaji. A se ckaji is a ka/du'u containing exactly one ce'u. #> That example is an error, and should be {le nu}. # #Indeed. IMHO it should be added to the Wiki errata list. Though on the Wiki it is corrected to du'u, not to nu. How so? --And.