From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Aug 31 10:08:14 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 17:08:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 97961 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 17:05:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 17:05:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45) by mta2 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 17:05:16 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.86.200]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010831170514.PNWN20588.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:05:14 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!" Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:04:28 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20010829232219.C1483@twcny.rr.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10336 Rob: > "whether D is a crook". Not every grammatical construct has to be "evaluated" > to something shorter. In general, things *are* fully evaluated in Lojban. The times when you want something that doesn't evaluate are special cases, that call for special constructions, the ones that cause us so much perplexity. --And.