From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Mon Aug 13 10:17:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 17:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 76627 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 17:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 17:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 17:15:27 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.12]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010813171525.PGL23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:15:25 +0100 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] {kai'i} Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:14:13 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 In-Reply-To: From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9493 John: > And Rosta scripsit: > > > {ka} doesn't have an x2. I once swore blind that I had a ma'oste > > showing that it did, much to Lojbab's consternation, first, > > and to my embarrassment, later, when I checked and found I had > > misremembered. > > The idea of an x2 for ka interests me. Could you re-relate > what you thought it was? ti ka broda kei ta = ta ckaji loi ka broda kei ti --And.