From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Mon Aug 06 15:19:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 22:19:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 39438 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 22:17:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 22:17:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 22:17:56 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.255.41.128]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010806221754.WZLE6330.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 23:17:54 +0100 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 23:16:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <9kku4o+t93l@eGroups.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9266 Mark: > Jorge's analysis, that {mi djuno le du'u makau klama} means the same > as {mi djuno le du'u la djan. klama} but with {la djan.} "covered up" but also crucially that {mi djuno le du'u makau klama} means the same as {mi djuno le du'u la bil na klama} with {la djan na} covered up. --And.