From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Fri Aug 03 16:39:41 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 3 Aug 2001 23:39:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 83077 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 23:39:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Aug 2001 23:39:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2001 23:39:40 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.85]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010803233939.EVPR6330.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:39:39 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] From the Wiki: The 17 tallest men
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:38:35 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEDLEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010803014757.00c3cb30@pop.cais.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9140

Lojbab:
> At 03:36 PM 8/2/01 -0700, Nick  NICHOLAS wrote:
> >The question on "How do you say the 17 tallest men" came up in the Wiki;
> 
> paze remna poi clamau da'apaze remna

I thought this was a good answer, but on closer inspection I think it
doesn't work. This is because I think it means that each of the 17
people is taller than all but 17 people. But you could fix this by
changing it to:

  pa ze remna poi clamau da'a su'e pa ze remna

or 

  pa ze remna poi clamau su'o da'a pa ze remna

The repetition of {pa ze} is unecessary:

  ro remna poi clamau da'a su'e pa ze remna

  ro remna poi clamau su'o da'a pa ze remna

But the repetition of {remna} is rather unsatisfying.

So:

 ro da poi ge da da'a su'e pa ze de clamau gi ri e ra remna

 ro da poi ge da su'o da'a pa ze de clamau gi ri e ra remna

Or, since the de should not be within the scope of the ge:

 ro da poi xi pa ke'a (xi pa) da'a su'e pa ze de poi xi re 
    ke'a xi pa e ke'a xi re remna ku'o clamau [ku'o]

 ro da poi xi pa ke'a (xi pa) su'o da'a pa ze de poi xi re 
    ke'a xi pa e ke'a xi re remna ku'o clamau [ku'o]

This last pair is the best, I think.

--And.