From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Sat Aug 04 19:10:19 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 02:10:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 40374 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 02:10:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 02:10:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.41) by mta2 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 02:10:19 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.40.25]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010805021017.GIBJ15984.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 03:10:17 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Well I guess you do learn something new every day...
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 03:09:25 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEGAEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <9ki4tb+tfm2@eGroups.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9193

Adam:
> I really think that "no'a" would be more useful (and easier to think 
> about) referring to the main bridi.

The next outer would be {no'a xi pa} and the outermost would be
{no'a xi ro}. The only decision is then whether xi-less no'a
defaults to {no'a xi ro} or {no'a xi pa}.

--And.