From pycyn@aol.com Wed Aug 29 08:21:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 15:21:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 71005 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 15:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 15:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r01.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.97) by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 15:18:22 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.150.1de490 (4353) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <150.1de490.28be61bc@aol.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:18:20 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_150.1de490.28be61bc_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10242 --part1_150.1de490.28be61bc_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/28/2001 8:00:51 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: > You didn't read what I wrote. I know that they are _defined_ as > quantity and truth value, but they are _used_ only as property > and proposition. > And why do we pay attention to (in some cases deliberate) misuse? "Let usage decide" only applies to Lojban usage, not Nalgol. --part1_150.1de490.28be61bc_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/28/2001 8:00:51 PM Central Daylight Time,
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:


You didn't read what I wrote. I know that they are _defined_ as
quantity and truth value, but they are _used_ only as property
and proposition.


And why do we pay attention to (in some cases deliberate) misuse?  "Let usage
decide" only applies to Lojban usage, not Nalgol. --part1_150.1de490.28be61bc_boundary--