From pycyn@aol.com Fri Aug 03 14:51:03 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 3 Aug 2001 21:51:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 59003 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 21:51:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Aug 2001 21:51:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m09.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.164) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2001 21:51:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id r.e3.188026d7 (4543) for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:50:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:50:51 EDT Subject: Re: ce'u To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_e3.188026d7.289c76bb_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9134 --part1_e3.188026d7.289c76bb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (apologies to xorxes for repeat) In a message dated 8/3/2001 3:24:22 PM Central Daylight Time,=20 jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: > la xod cusku di'e >=20 > >However, the problem may be worse than you state. Page 259, ex. 4.4: > > > > =A0=A0=A0le ka do xunre cu cnino mi > > =A0=A0=A0the property-of your being-red is new to me. > > > >Where is your ce'u there? In a place that's already filled! >=20 > That should have been: >=20 > =A0=A0=A0=A0le nu do xunre cu cnino mi >=20 > We should not use {ka broda} just because broda happens to be > an adjective in English. >=20 Surely the right thing to say here, but there is (for loopholing) the=20 position that closed property abstracts are properties of worlds or some su= ch=20 things (which turns out to be dangerously close to event abstracts, in fact= ). --part1_e3.188026d7.289c76bb_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (apologies to xorxes for repeat)
In a message dated 8/3/2001 3:24:22 PM Central Daylight Time,=20
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:



la xod cusku di'e

>However, the problem may be worse than you state. Page 259, ex. 4.4= :
>
> =A0=A0=A0le ka do xunre cu cnino mi
> =A0=A0=A0the property-of your being-red is new to me.
>
>Where is your ce'u there? In a place that's already filled!

That should have been:

=A0=A0=A0=A0le nu do xunre cu cnino mi

We should not use {ka broda} just because broda happens to be
an adjective in English.




Surely the right thing to say here, but there is (for loopholing) the=20
position that closed property abstracts are properties of worlds or som= e such=20
things (which turns out to be dangerously close to event abstracts, in = fact). --part1_e3.188026d7.289c76bb_boundary--