From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Sat Aug 04 18:19:56 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 01:19:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 63127 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 01:19:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 01:19:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.41) by mta2 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 01:19:55 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.43.93]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010805011953.GCUX15984.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 02:19:53 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] 17 tallest men: summary
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 02:19:01 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEFOEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0108032019250.10681-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9188

Nick:
> I've posted the thread as it stands so far on:
> 
> http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?The%2017%20tallest%20men

This is a lovely summary & document. I wish more of our threads
ended up so well organized.
 
> Please note my post-note to And:
> 
> To which [nitcion] adds that this use of SOV is perverse, and ''da''
> clearly has scope over the relative clauses. In human-compatible Lojban
> this is:
> 
> *ro da poi da clamau da'a su'e pa ze de poi da .e ke'a remna
> *ro da poi da clamau su'o da'a pa ze de poi da .e ke'a remna

I said it the way I did partly because I enjoyed the opportunity to
use subscripts on poi and ke'a, and partly because it's not clear
which modificands of relative clauses can be referred to within
the relative clause by something other than ke'a.

But, given your user-friendly version, why not go the whole hog:

 *ro da poi da clamau da'a su'e pa ze de poi da .e de remna
 *ro da poi da clamau su'o da'a pa ze de poi da .e de remna

--And.